Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:12 AM
scheming daemons (21,273 posts)
Naming Paul Ryan as veep is a collosal mistake by Romney
Naming Ryan makes the Ryan budget effectively the Romney budget.
The Ryan budget may be the singularly least popular piece of legislation proposed since prohibition. The ads write themselves. Obama and our superpacs can now pull line items out of the Ryan budget for use in ads..... like ending Medicare, extreme cuts to social services and to the wealthy's tax rates. It will be a goldmine. The fact that he is an Ayn Rand fanboy is an added bonus.
|
119 replies, 9645 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| scheming daemons | Aug 2012 | OP | |
| SidDithers | Aug 2012 | #1 | |
| roguevalley | Aug 2012 | #31 | |
| Brother Buzz | Aug 2012 | #2 | |
| part man all 86 | Aug 2012 | #32 | |
| Fawke Em | Aug 2012 | #53 | |
| PurityOfEssence | Aug 2012 | #95 | |
| Motown_Johnny | Aug 2012 | #3 | |
| ProfessionalLeftist | Aug 2012 | #4 | |
| Cognitive_Resonance | Aug 2012 | #5 | |
| elzenmahn | Aug 2012 | #12 | |
| yurbud | Aug 2012 | #108 | |
| matmar | Aug 2012 | #6 | |
| tblue | Aug 2012 | #13 | |
| Lefty Thinker | Aug 2012 | #27 | |
| catbyte | Aug 2012 | #51 | |
| JoePhilly | Aug 2012 | #112 | |
| Ikonoklast | Aug 2012 | #7 | |
| tblue | Aug 2012 | #16 | |
| BlueStreak | Aug 2012 | #19 | |
| Chemisse | Aug 2012 | #102 | |
| part man all 86 | Aug 2012 | #37 | |
| Tunkamerica | Aug 2012 | #40 | |
| tavalon | Aug 2012 | #61 | |
| Tunkamerica | Aug 2012 | #65 | |
| backwoodsbob | Aug 2012 | #68 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #85 | |
| Firebrand Gary | Aug 2012 | #8 | |
| elzenmahn | Aug 2012 | #10 | |
| elzenmahn | Aug 2012 | #9 | |
| BlueStreak | Aug 2012 | #21 | |
| Auntie Bush | Aug 2012 | #105 | |
| golfguru | Aug 2012 | #30 | |
| Fumesucker | Aug 2012 | #66 | |
| yardwork | Aug 2012 | #74 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #77 | |
| yardwork | Aug 2012 | #78 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #79 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #88 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #94 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #100 | |
| vankuria | Aug 2012 | #92 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #96 | |
| Chemisse | Aug 2012 | #103 | |
| golfguru | Aug 2012 | #80 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #97 | |
| golfguru | Aug 2012 | #114 | |
| ellenfl | Aug 2012 | #119 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #101 | |
| golfguru | Aug 2012 | #115 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #118 | |
| jmowreader | Aug 2012 | #45 | |
| jeff47 | Aug 2012 | #86 | |
| Kalidurga | Aug 2012 | #11 | |
| NYC Liberal | Aug 2012 | #36 | |
| fishwax | Aug 2012 | #14 | |
| grantcart | Aug 2012 | #34 | |
| neverforget | Aug 2012 | #15 | |
| Delphinus | Aug 2012 | #84 | |
| Panasonic | Aug 2012 | #17 | |
| Warpy | Aug 2012 | #18 | |
| Aerows | Aug 2012 | #20 | |
| Rowdyboy | Aug 2012 | #38 | |
| Grammy23 | Aug 2012 | #22 | |
| Avalux | Aug 2012 | #23 | |
| Caretha | Aug 2012 | #69 | |
| Cognitive_Resonance | Aug 2012 | #24 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Aug 2012 | #25 | |
| Tx4obama | Aug 2012 | #54 | |
| UnrepentantLiberal | Aug 2012 | #57 | |
| Raine | Aug 2012 | #26 | |
| Lone_Star_Dem | Aug 2012 | #28 | |
| SunSeeker | Aug 2012 | #29 | |
| Kablooie | Aug 2012 | #33 | |
| Cognitive_Resonance | Aug 2012 | #35 | |
| Bjorn Against | Aug 2012 | #83 | |
| thecascadian | Aug 2012 | #39 | |
| renate | Aug 2012 | #110 | |
| Fozzledick | Aug 2012 | #41 | |
| synapticwave | Aug 2012 | #42 | |
| D23MIURG23 | Aug 2012 | #43 | |
| TicketyBoo | Aug 2012 | #44 | |
| libodem | Aug 2012 | #46 | |
| Guy Montag | Aug 2012 | #47 | |
| DallasNE | Aug 2012 | #48 | |
| PeaceNikki | Aug 2012 | #49 | |
| Qutzupalotl | Aug 2012 | #50 | |
| Firebrand Gary | Aug 2012 | #52 | |
| still_one | Aug 2012 | #55 | |
| caseymoz | Aug 2012 | #56 | |
| Cali_Democrat | Aug 2012 | #58 | |
| Poll_Blind | Aug 2012 | #59 | |
| tavalon | Aug 2012 | #60 | |
| rad51 | Aug 2012 | #62 | |
| cali | Aug 2012 | #63 | |
| NYC Liberal | Aug 2012 | #75 | |
| sendero | Aug 2012 | #64 | |
| DearAbby | Aug 2012 | #93 | |
| randome | Aug 2012 | #109 | |
| madokie | Aug 2012 | #67 | |
| nichomachus | Aug 2012 | #71 | |
| cali | Aug 2012 | #73 | |
| madokie | Aug 2012 | #90 | |
| gulliver | Aug 2012 | #82 | |
| Bluenorthwest | Aug 2012 | #89 | |
| nichomachus | Aug 2012 | #70 | |
| yardwork | Aug 2012 | #72 | |
| DCBob | Aug 2012 | #76 | |
| Odin2005 | Aug 2012 | #81 | |
| Ruby the Liberal | Aug 2012 | #87 | |
| IDemo | Aug 2012 | #104 | |
| Ruby the Liberal | Aug 2012 | #106 | |
| pampango | Aug 2012 | #91 | |
| HooptieWagon | Aug 2012 | #98 | |
| hifiguy | Aug 2012 | #99 | |
| yurbud | Aug 2012 | #107 | |
| Skraxx | Aug 2012 | #111 | |
| 4 t 4 | Aug 2012 | #113 | |
| B Calm | Aug 2012 | #116 | |
| Tarheel_Dem | Aug 2012 | #117 |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:14 AM
SidDithers (27,047 posts)
1. I agree...
|
but ain't it great?
Sid |
Response to SidDithers (Reply #1)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:43 AM
roguevalley (32,808 posts)
31. Rumnuts fave book is Battlefield Earth (Scientology) and Ryan is Randian. He also loses
|
Florida. Among other places.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:15 AM
Brother Buzz (8,367 posts)
2. Take stock in Napoleon's words
|
"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
|
Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #2)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:45 AM
part man all 86 (367 posts)
32. Nice!
Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #2)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:58 AM
Fawke Em (2,556 posts)
53. We should shut up, then.
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) But, geez... how does one actually laugh without making noise?
|
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #53)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:14 PM
PurityOfEssence (13,148 posts)
95. Snicker baby, snicker
|
Never count out the well-financed reactionaries, though...
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:16 AM
Motown_Johnny (15,457 posts)
3. no attempt to balance the budget for 28 years
|
I heard that one today on Ed's show (I think) and almost fell off my seat. Ed had some old conservative I don't know throwing out names for VP that would be better than Ryan. Maybe Ed heard something ahead of time and wanted to get that stuff on the record.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:17 AM
ProfessionalLeftist (4,982 posts)
4. HuffPo says he's it
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:18 AM
Cognitive_Resonance (985 posts)
5. An Obama landslide is now a real possibility. nt
Response to Cognitive_Resonance (Reply #5)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:38 AM
elzenmahn (268 posts)
12. Maybe MittWitt can take some of the Repub congresscritters down with him...
|
...when he is shown the door in November. Obama needs a congress he can work with.
|
Response to Cognitive_Resonance (Reply #5)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 07:05 PM
yurbud (31,405 posts)
108. the real question: will it exceed Papa Bush v. Dukakis or Reagan v. Mondale...
|
or FDR v. Alf Landon as the most lopsided in history?
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:24 AM
matmar (593 posts)
6. Not to mention the Catholic Nuns have called his budget anti-human.
Response to matmar (Reply #6)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:43 AM
tblue (13,895 posts)
13. Oh yeah. Don't mess with the nuns.
|
Put them in a commercial!
|
Response to matmar (Reply #6)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:18 AM
Lefty Thinker (63 posts)
27. Whatever will the Catholic bishops say?
|
They called Ryan's budget immoral, but seem to have a, hmmmm, predilection for a Rmoney win.
|
Response to matmar (Reply #6)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:52 AM
catbyte (3,945 posts)
51. Actually it was the Bishops. The nuns merely agreed.
|
A small yet important distinction.
|
Response to catbyte (Reply #51)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:01 PM
JoePhilly (15,988 posts)
112. And boarded a bus, crossing the country to criticise the Ryan budget.
|
That's the nuns, not the Bishops.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:24 AM
Ikonoklast (21,631 posts)
7. Dammit, ix-nay on the istake-may!
|
Picking Ryan is a masterstroke of genius!
Don't anyone pay attention to the OP, he's talking crazy talk! Democrats are trembling in fear over this brilliant move! |
Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #7)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:45 AM
tblue (13,895 posts)
16. Brilliant. Because nobody likes Medicare and Social Security.
|
Brilliant
|
Response to tblue (Reply #16)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:55 AM
BlueStreak (3,771 posts)
19. Cat food isn't as bad as it sounds.
Response to BlueStreak (Reply #19)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:33 PM
Chemisse (18,405 posts)
102. Yum. I can't WAIT to turn 65!
Response to Ikonoklast (Reply #7)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:50 AM
part man all 86 (367 posts)
37. Need to go to college go ask your parents for the money.
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:50 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) The government is not a bank for you people.
|
Response to part man all 86 (Reply #37)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:01 AM
Tunkamerica (4,355 posts)
40. what's that, guy?
|
please explain
|
Response to Tunkamerica (Reply #40)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:07 AM
tavalon (25,684 posts)
61. I think it's irony
|
but I'm not sure. It could have used a sarcasm tag.
|
Response to tavalon (Reply #61)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:38 AM
Tunkamerica (4,355 posts)
65. It could use a couple of things.
Response to Tunkamerica (Reply #40)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:59 AM
backwoodsbob (4,748 posts)
68. it is
|
something RMoney said
|
Response to part man all 86 (Reply #37)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:48 PM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
85. Nah, just use Social Security benefits, like Ryan did. (nt)
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:30 AM
Firebrand Gary (3,313 posts)
8. We get to run against Ryan, literally in EVERY SINGLE HOUSE AND SENATE SEAT!
|
|
Response to Firebrand Gary (Reply #8)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:34 AM
elzenmahn (268 posts)
10. And the playbook to use is his own budget proposal...
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:40 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) ...I'm loving this already. Ryan has had his head up Ayn Rand's ass so far he can't see what a political liability his budget will be.
"The Path To Austerity"...indeed. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:32 AM
elzenmahn (268 posts)
9. If memory serves me correctly...
|
...didn't Rmoney already state that he supported the Paul Ryan budget?
BTW, for you home owners out there with mortgages - I'd check Mr. Ryan's budget plan if I were you. Is there not a mention in there regarding removing the mortgage interest tax deduction? If so, that will certainly win over some voters. This is rich - and I think, exactly what the Obama campaign was hoping for. I am delighted. |
Response to elzenmahn (Reply #9)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:58 AM
BlueStreak (3,771 posts)
21. Yes, but now he OWNS it.
|
Obama can attribute anything in the Ryan budget directly to Romney. They simply have to refer to it as the "Romney/Ryan Budget plan".
We should not underestimate the ability of the MSM to fawn all over Ryan, but hopefully they got that out of their system 9 months ago. |
Response to BlueStreak (Reply #21)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:38 PM
Auntie Bush (15,250 posts)
105. How about calling it the Mittryan budget plan? Easy to say.
|
We can also speak of them collectively as Mittryan. i.e. Mittryan is a sleaze bag. Kills 2 birds with one stone and deprives both of then publicity.
|
Response to elzenmahn (Reply #9)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:36 AM
golfguru (4,344 posts)
30. But I am just a lowly renter and not a home owner or landlord
|
I get no mortgage deduction anyway. I will settle for lowering tax brackets instead.
|
Response to golfguru (Reply #30)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:42 AM
Fumesucker (31,579 posts)
66. Even for a lot of homeowners the standard deduction beats itemized..
|
I was in that situation for at least a decade, if you don't owe a great deal on your home the mortgage interest deduction is not that good a deal.
|
Response to golfguru (Reply #30)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:59 AM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
74. Lots of those coveted independent voters are home owners. They love the deduction.
|
Think of the typical "independent" voter. They live in a slightly rural area in the midwest or south and own their home and some land around it. They have a garage and maybe a wired workshop. They have a riding mower that they bought on credit, and they're planning to add to the deck this year but they're worried that "Obamacare" will take their money. Now they hear that the Romney ticket is planning to take away their mortgage tax deduction?! That's the only part of the tax code that they understand - you buy a house because you get to deduct the mortgage on your taxes.
Fatal, fatal, fatal. |
Response to yardwork (Reply #74)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:49 AM
ellenfl (8,285 posts)
77. i don't pay enough mtg interest to itemize and so have to take the standard deduction.
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:52 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) i bet many other americans are in the same boat. imo, that benefit is a myth for many.
ellen fl |
Response to ellenfl (Reply #77)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:51 AM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
78. Maybe so, but they may not even realize it. I'm serious. It's the perception that matters.
Response to yardwork (Reply #78)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:56 AM
ellenfl (8,285 posts)
79. the ones who don't realize it are surely first time buyers.
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:58 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) as a real estate paralegal, i'm not seeing a lot of those in today's market. the decline in real estate values affects this as well.
ellen fl |
Response to ellenfl (Reply #79)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:54 PM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
88. And you think raising the effective cost of all houses by 12-15%
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:55 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) is gonna do good thing for real estate values?
|
Response to ellenfl (Reply #94)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:27 PM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
100. Mortgage interest deduction reduces the effective price of houses
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:29 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) That deduction gives many homebuyers money back, especially just after the purchase when mortgage payments are almost all interest. About 40 million people take the deduction, so it's not an insignificant number of income tax payers.
It's estimated* that this cash back effectively makes houses 12-15% cheaper. So eliminating the deduction, despite not effecting you, would raise home prices by 12-15%, and do so in a way that current homeowners can't benefit. That's not going to be good for real estate. *Estimate is by the National Association of Realtors, so they are not exactly unbiased. But I have not found any other estimates. |
Response to ellenfl (Reply #77)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:07 PM
vankuria (332 posts)
92. It's not a myth to us
|
and for many homeowners I know. The mortgage interest tax deduction is a big deal, so you can't speak for everyone.
|
Response to vankuria (Reply #92)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:17 PM
ellenfl (8,285 posts)
96. i didn't say i spoke for everyone. i'm just saying i was surprised and
|
disappointed that when i finally could deduct, the amount was not enough. it also meant that my insurance premiums were from taxed income. i know i shouldn't complain that i didn't have costs enough to itemize and so get a break in my taxes, but i don't think i'm the only taxpayer who actually pays the tax rate and not a lower effective rate.
oh well, i guess i can save money not having to buy turbotax anymore. ellen fl |
Response to ellenfl (Reply #77)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:36 PM
Chemisse (18,405 posts)
103. If there was no mortgage deduction, the standard deduction could go much lower
|
and people would still take it because it is more than when itemizing.
So this will hurt us all. |
Response to yardwork (Reply #74)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:09 PM
golfguru (4,344 posts)
80. Those rural home owners you describe are most likely NOT in a high tax bracket
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:38 PM USA/ET - Edit history (3) Over the years, I have greatly appreciated the standard deduction increasing
each year indexed in some way to inflation. Also, many deductions are no longer allowed such as interest on a car loan. So, unless you have a high mortgage amount and a high tax bracket, most people are better off with the standard deduction and a lower tax rate. Make a note that the mortgage deduction is only as good as your tax bracket. The mortgage interest on a $200,000 mortgage at today's rates is about $8000 per year. In a 15% bracket (most people), that is $1200 savings in taxes. The standard deduction even at 15% tax bracket is worth more, for most people. |
Response to golfguru (Reply #80)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:19 PM
ellenfl (8,285 posts)
97. i wish my tax rate was 15%! eom
Response to ellenfl (Reply #97)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:26 AM
golfguru (4,344 posts)
114. Nurse, teacher, policeman, fireman, city bus driver, garbage truck driver etc
|
all make enough $$$ to be in 15% or higher bracket.
|
Response to golfguru (Reply #114)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 12:10 PM
ellenfl (8,285 posts)
119. i think 'or higher' applies. eom
Response to golfguru (Reply #80)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:30 PM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
101. Slightly rural, not rural
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:31 PM USA/ET - Edit history (2) Think newer suburb, where the houses are bigger than the 1960's-era suburbs.
|
Response to jeff47 (Reply #101)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:43 AM
golfguru (4,344 posts)
115. Median Family income in 2011 was $56,000 (2 wage earners)
|
Rule of thumb is that you should not spend more than 1/4 of your income on house payments. That gives us $14,000 for principle + interest + tax.
Interest + tax are itemized deductible items. At beginning of mortgage period, most money goes to interest and near end of mortgage period most money goes towards principle which is NOT tax deductible. Hence even at start of mortgage period, your tax savings will be $2100 due to mortgage deduction, for median American family. Compare that to standard deduction of $11.900. It is a no brainer that standard deduction is the winner. |
Response to golfguru (Reply #115)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 11:41 AM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
118. The poor aren't buying houses.
|
Thus, median income is the wrong stat to use. You need to use median for home buyers.
About 40 million income tax payers take the mortgage interest deduction. |
Response to elzenmahn (Reply #9)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:16 AM
jmowreader (23,925 posts)
45. No one's sure what the "loopholes" Ryan intends to close are, because he won't say
|
However! The Path to Recession calls for eliminating taxes on corporate profits earned overseas (translation: no more good jobs in the US because they'll ALL be outsourced), reducing corporate tax from 35 percent to 25, and eliminating the alternative minimum tax.
|
Response to elzenmahn (Reply #9)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:49 PM
jeff47 (7,418 posts)
86. He said he supported it....and then that he doesn't support it. (nt)
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:35 AM
Kalidurga (4,820 posts)
11. Um no picking Ryan is great...
|
I have been rooting for him for a long time. Never in my wildest dreams did I think it was going to happen. If I had to hand pick a running mate for Romney this is the one I would have picked. Who else in the GOP is just as heartless as Romney. Not even Palin who never met a dollar she didn't like is as heartless. I think Romney has just enough rope now.
|
Response to Kalidurga (Reply #11)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:48 AM
NYC Liberal (15,599 posts)
36. I see what you did there.
|
Totally agree...we should be REALLY worried now. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:43 AM
fishwax (25,076 posts)
14. It ties Romney both to the unpopular legislation and to the unpopular Congress
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:42 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) I guess the thinking is that it will make the base happy, but while a few wingers who don't like Romney might now show up to vote, that will be vastly outweighed by the undecideds and older voters he drives away.
I agree with you. Colossal mistake. (Thanks, Mitt |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:44 AM
neverforget (6,314 posts)
15. This unmasks the vision Republicans have for America: the wealthy rule and no safety net for you
Response to neverforget (Reply #15)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:07 PM
Delphinus (6,279 posts)
84. You are
|
absolutely correct! Thank you for stating what is in my heart.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:52 AM
Panasonic (2,921 posts)
17. That will get the baggers side even worse
|
since Ryan's a bagger....
So he's picking one of their own to try to control the freaks... Here's Ryan's job from now on - dogshit picker, and he doesn't get to use a plastic bag. Or gloves. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:53 AM
Warpy (69,124 posts)
18. That handful of Koch led billionaires want to groom him to run in 2016
|
They don't honestly care how much the people of this country who are paying attention despise the overgrown punk, he's their boy and they want him in the top spot and think everything will be in place in 2016: Citizens United plus whatever devilment the USSC and state GOP do to make sure only white male Republicans can vote.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:56 AM
Aerows (13,849 posts)
20. This is fucking awesome
|
I can't imagine how anyone could see Paul Ryan as a bad pick for Democrats.
Rock on. I love it. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #20)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:51 AM
Rowdyboy (20,668 posts)
38. It really made my day....I was concerned about a couple of possibilities but Ryan wasn't one of them
|
Rmoney\Ryan is about as good as it gets for our side-it effectively ties Romney at the hip to House Republicans-not just Ryan's insane budget but he represents House Republicans. What a gift....
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:59 AM
Grammy23 (615 posts)
22. I agree----Paul Ryan is a gift
|
And that Budget of his is the big, bright bow on top! There will be so many opportunities to explain to the voters exactly what Mittens and Ryan have in mind for them for the next 4 (possibly 8) years. And it's not pretty for anyone who is not rich. It ought to be a cake walk for Obama. Unless.....
My biggest concern....that the Republican voters' hatred of Obama is stronger than their dislike of Romney and Ryan (or whoever he chooses.) With fingers firmly pressing their nostrils together, they will vote for Romney anyhow. I think they believe that none of what they are hearing will come to pass with Romney, even though he has promised to do a bunch of things on "Day One". And the Romney team is going to pull out all the stops to make sure their people show up to vote. And then there is the voter suppression of likely Democratic voters.....What should be a sure thing, a landslide for Obama could be stolen again. This is what makes me nervous and very angry. Is anyone else confident in our electoral system any more??? |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:00 AM
Avalux (28,938 posts)
23. But let's not allow Ryan's budget to take the focus off of Romney's taxes.
|
We know that's what they want. Everyone will be in a tizzy about Ryan that the tax issue will fall by the wayside. Can't let that happen.
|
Response to Avalux (Reply #23)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 06:47 AM
Caretha (1,791 posts)
69. I don't think we need to worry about that
|
Harry Reid has been playing this political keep it in the news move brilliantly. Everyone has been speculating for a couple weeks now who Harry's source is on MitWitt's inside tax info. I suspect that at just the right moment the "inside man's" identity will be revealed, and it will start a new round of "Show us your tax returns.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:03 AM
Cognitive_Resonance (985 posts)
24. Almost as awesome as a Jindal pick would have been. Ryan is not a credible choice. nt
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:10 AM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
25. It's Christmas!
|
After the Andrea Saul fiasco he really had no choice.
Boy is EarlG going to be happy when he wakes up tomorrow. |
Response to UnrepentantLiberal (Reply #25)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:07 AM
Tx4obama (28,858 posts)
54. EarlG already know. He posted a photo, see link below
Response to Tx4obama (Reply #54)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:15 AM
UnrepentantLiberal (11,700 posts)
57. He's in photoshop heaven!
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:16 AM
Raine (20,175 posts)
26. BEST news in the world for us, I'm thrilled! nt
|
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:21 AM
Lone_Star_Dem (27,576 posts)
28. They had to be afraid they were gonna lose the Teabaggers.
|
They couldn't afford that down ticket, so they're tossing the presidency to the wind to get the Baggers in to vote for the others.
I. Cannot. Believe. This. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:26 AM
SunSeeker (5,024 posts)
29. Oh come on! Herman & Eddie go so well together.
![]() |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:47 AM
Kablooie (8,853 posts)
33. A colostomistake.
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:48 AM
Cognitive_Resonance (985 posts)
35. This strikes me as a purely defensive play. Probably afraid their base would stay home endangering
|
down-ticket races. This is not a winning move for Romney. Portman was his best shot if he wanted to stay competitive.
|
Response to Cognitive_Resonance (Reply #35)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:46 PM
Bjorn Against (8,216 posts)
83. Paul Ryan is going to seriously endanger all their down ballot choices
|
The Ryan budget is very unpopular and nearly every Republican voted for it, the selection of Paul Ryan as VP will make the Ryan budget vote a top issue in every Congressional district in the nation. I am sure the DCCC is having a huge party today because they know every one of their candidates has just been given an electoral gift.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 01:59 AM
thecascadian (2 posts)
39. What, was Sarah Palin not available?
|
I thought Mormons weren't allowed to get high... Whoops!
I'm crossing my finger in hope this means choosing god-awful running mates has become a Republican tradition. Romney would have been better off with Mr. Burns as his veep. He would have to call Cheney out of retirement to make a worse choice. Keep up the good work Mittens, you're on track to make your 2012 GOP defeat even more embarrassing than McCain's in 2008. |
Response to thecascadian (Reply #39)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 07:08 PM
renate (7,926 posts)
110. welcome to DU!
|
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:06 AM
Fozzledick (2,098 posts)
41. We can only hope so.
|
But it sure makes him an easy target!
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:06 AM
synapticwave (42 posts)
42. This could be a longer-term strategy by the RNC
|
to shut the tea party up. Pick their guy, watch him go down in epic flames and then tell the tea party and ultra conservatives to STFU and get in line for the mid-terms and 2016 race. I highly doubt it is part of their strategy, but it may have that side affect anyway.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:13 AM
D23MIURG23 (2,168 posts)
43. To be fair he didn't have many good options.
|
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:14 AM
TicketyBoo (1,926 posts)
44. Wow, I hope this is good news
|
because I really FEAR that ticket if they were actually to end up elected.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:16 AM
libodem (11,814 posts)
46. New Yorker
|
Article tells it all. Has that hit good reads?
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:34 AM
Guy Montag (126 posts)
47. Thanks for the early Christmas gift Willard, This is a guaranteed loser of a pick
|
Last edited Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:36 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1) This makes mcLame's choice of the half gov. look positively brilliant.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:34 AM
DallasNE (2,952 posts)
48. The Fox News Poll Friday
|
That showed Obama with 17% support from those who identified themselves as Tea Party supporters and the WSJ editorial that endorsed Ryan as the VP pick sort of tied Romney's hand when it came to picking the VP. This also takes away some of the steam of Ron Paul supporters at the convention. The challenge will be for Ryan not to show Romney up.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:36 AM
PeaceNikki (19,239 posts)
49. Ryan "denounced" Rand earlier this year. presumably in
|
Preparation for this.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:41 AM
Qutzupalotl (7,515 posts)
50. He's doubling down as if he's going to win the argument
|
against Obama. Not likely. More likely they'll doom each other.
But he's so dreamy! |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 02:56 AM
Firebrand Gary (3,313 posts)
52. The Romney/Ryan plan gives themselves tax cuts and we don't even get to see if they need them??????
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:08 AM
still_one (31,078 posts)
55. I hope you are right. I am not sure how dense the American public is though. One thing for certain
|
there should be no doubt in anyones mind that this choice should leave no doubt in any independents mind that romney is no moderate
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 03:26 AM
caseymoz (5,172 posts)
56. A lot of possibilities here . . .
|
. . . not all of them good. However, is it also possible that Romney might end Paul Ryan's career, too? The bad possibility is this: that the base does rally around the duo and Ryan brings the Randite loonies out on election day, while gerrymandering, voter suppression, and vote hacking do the rest for the GOP, with the Supreme Court there to install Romney if all else fails. We'll still likely win, but the consequences of losing this one are now even more enormous than ever. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:18 AM
Cali_Democrat (14,667 posts)
58. My thoughts exactly.
|
I'm still scratching my head over this one. It's a HUGE mistake by Romney.
This will be a landslide election. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:21 AM
Poll_Blind (23,188 posts)
59. Everything you said is true. I'm hoping it really is Ryan.
|
We might even gain some seats in the goddamned House with a ticket that completely fucked up.
That's gonna be about as popular as running Hermann Göring and Idi Amin. PB |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:06 AM
tavalon (25,684 posts)
60. I see this as an early Christmas present from RMoney
|
I never knew he cared about us so much. It is the perfect gift, isn't it?
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:11 AM
rad51 (88 posts)
62. +100
|
I can't wait to see the polls in 2 weeks!
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:12 AM
cali (80,185 posts)
63. I'm not sure it will make much difference
|
As Romney had already endorsed the Ryan budget, dems are already free to dig tidbits out of it and use it against romney, and as people so often note, the number 2 on a ticket, historically hasn't made much difference. Still, I think it's a pick that shows romney is increasingly desperate. I also think having 2 unlikeable assholes on a ticket makes things worse for romney.
|
Response to cali (Reply #63)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:04 AM
NYC Liberal (15,599 posts)
75. Yep, but Romney needed someone who could make a difference.
|
The last thing he needed was someone who hurt him or someone who did nothing. Ryan, at best, does nothing.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:15 AM
sendero (25,000 posts)
64. One wonders how much power the GOP itself..
|
. has over these sorts of decisions. It's like they are throwing the game. Like they have decided Romney cannot win this year so they are preparing for 2016.
That's what it looks like to me anyway. |
Response to sendero (Reply #64)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:08 PM
DearAbby (12,180 posts)
93. I don't believe the Adults are in charge at GOP
|
Tea party has more power within the GOP than we realized. The Bush Presidency caused a shift of power. The moderates of the party have some real serious thinking to do...save the country..or vote party and take us all down. Are you Patriots, or party loyalists?
|
Response to DearAbby (Reply #93)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 07:08 PM
randome (12,650 posts)
109. You are absolutely correct.
|
The TP is like an infection within the GOP. They are delusional with fever if they think they can win with Romney/Ryan.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:42 AM
madokie (36,577 posts)
67. And the fact that he is as dumb as a stump
|
adds some comic relief to this election season
|
Response to madokie (Reply #67)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:54 AM
nichomachus (10,085 posts)
71. I don't think he is
|
And that's going to be a problem. Also, unlike Mitt, he's very quick on his feet.
|
Response to madokie (Reply #67)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:56 AM
cali (80,185 posts)
73. whatever else he is, he's not stupid. and he's not inarticulate.
|
thinking he is either of those things is a mistake.
|
Response to cali (Reply #73)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:03 PM
madokie (36,577 posts)
90. read what he tried to pull off with his budget and tell me he is 1: smart 2: articulate
|
he's stupid and dumb as a stump to boot
Sometimes you make me laugh and this is one of those times |
Response to madokie (Reply #67)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:17 PM
gulliver (8,525 posts)
82. He thinks he's an intellectual.
|
He's like a younger, dumber Newt Gingrich before Newt had a chance to discover his inner existential demons. Ryan thinks we are living in an Ayn Rand novel. He is a simpleton, but smarter than his fans. Like a David Koresh, just a tad higher up the bell curve, but not by much.
|
Response to gulliver (Reply #82)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:03 PM
Bluenorthwest (24,143 posts)
89. I very much agree, and perfectly stated.
|
no need to add a thing
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:53 AM
nichomachus (10,085 posts)
70. I thought the Teabaggers hated career politicians
|
Ryan has never had a real job. His whole career is in politics. Aren't these the people the Teabaggers want to throw out?
Mitt has never had a real job either. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:55 AM
yardwork (37,074 posts)
72. I think that the Koch brothers think that they can buy this election.
|
It's the only thing that makes sense.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 11:13 AM
DCBob (14,768 posts)
76. agreed.
|
Its not a game changer for sure. He doesnt really appeal to anyone outside of the Norquist/teabagger/budget and tax nerd types. Short term minor bump at best and long term a negative.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 12:09 PM
Odin2005 (48,255 posts)
81. Even the RCC hates him!
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 04:52 PM
Ruby the Liberal (23,501 posts)
87. Gekko/Galt 2012
|
Let the debate begin.
|
Response to Ruby the Liberal (Reply #87)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:36 PM
IDemo (12,302 posts)
104. That's worthy of a bumper sticker
|
Except the Randites would likely believe it was intended as a compliment.
|
Response to IDemo (Reply #104)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:40 PM
Ruby the Liberal (23,501 posts)
106. Let 'em.
|
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:05 PM
pampango (13,986 posts)
91. The ONLY way this works for mitt is if it placates teabaggers for 3 months and
|
he can track to the center after the conventions without losing the base that has never been thrilled with him.
If he continues to pander to the teabagger/libertarian wing of the party all fall, I think he is toast. But if he starts talking like a moderate (with a wink to the far-right - "I gave you Ryan. Just get me elected and watch the 'fun') he might have a chance. That strategy would rely on two traditions: 1) most voters don't vote for a ticket based on the VP (while hoping that baggers and libertarians will do just that) and 2) many voters don't start paying attention until after Labor Day, so that won't know or care what mitt has said during the primary campaign. I think Ryan is a bad pick but I don't see that he had a good one. I doubt that baggers will really be able to hold their collective breaths for 3 months. Mitt may think he has some kind of deal with them with the Ryan pick but it will be interesting to see how long the far-right can stick with any 'deal'. |
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:20 PM
HooptieWagon (6,320 posts)
98. I disagree, its not a mistake at all.
|
If Rmoney had any RW appeal at all, he could afford to tack to the middle and select a moderate for VP. That he had to pick an extremist RWer for VP shows the campaign is desparate to fire up an unenthusiastic base, and they have no intention of even trying to appeal to moderates and swing voters. Rmoney's strategy is right out in the open... a media barrage of attack ads, slander, and lies; and voter suppression.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 05:20 PM
hifiguy (13,029 posts)
99. The WH oppo researchers are popping the champagne
|
as we type. They are going to pound this silly fucker into the ground like a tent peg. The Zombie Eyed Granny Starver is the last nail in the Mittwit's political coffin.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 06:35 PM
yurbud (31,405 posts)
107. they should play up that Ayn Rand angle in the Bible Belt
|
and contrast it with some of the Bible parable like the Good Samaritan and some of the social justice commandments of Jesus.
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 07:42 PM
Skraxx (350 posts)
111. It Was A Panicky, Base-Pleasing Pick
|
And he was absolutely corralled into it by a superlative Obama campaign.
He HAD to please his base. This pick guarantees that the election WILL be about the issues that matter. Well played Mr. President. |
Response to Skraxx (Reply #111)
Sat Aug 11, 2012, 10:18 PM
4 t 4 (2,285 posts)
113. it's not a mistake if you're throwing the whole race
|
Obama will win the next 4 years No question hands down and then you will see a republican in the white house. Do you really think for one single second that these two clowns are taken seriously by Anyone- anyone even Fox News. This is a complete set up .
|
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 03:48 AM
B Calm (17,277 posts)
116. Republicans are not deep thinkers!
Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Sun Aug 12, 2012, 04:21 AM
Tarheel_Dem (16,643 posts)
117. K&R
|
|


