Thu Aug 2, 2012, 07:25 PM
pepperbear (5,068 posts)
If people think that "taking the moral high ground" is about consuming fatty, deep-fried,
sodium-filled, cholesterol-ridden (not to mention "pickled") fast food chicken because it comes from "their kind of business," well OK then.
Their "artist's rendering":
The stark reality:
A break down of "nutritional content:"
I'm not getting all high and mighty about nutrition, but just remember that, in typical fashion, these yokels can be counted upon to do something stupid like put this kind of crap into their bodies in the name of their "right to be a bigot": It's nothing more than "Heygrandpawhat'sforsuppergoodoldredwhiteandblueAmericanfamilyrednecklarrythecableguybigbellywhythehellweneedprilosec" food.
Their gastric antics aren't going to make anyone with sense forget that they also think they're the only ones entitled to free speech. It must only apply to them, after all, seeing as how no one's rights have actually been infringed upon, except the gay community and its right to be a part of the American experience.....well, such that it is, obviously.
4 replies, 969 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
If people think that "taking the moral high ground" is about consuming fatty, deep-fried, (Original post)