Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:35 PM
phantom power (22,530 posts)
Lame Duck Terrorism (3rd Way Gunning for Social Security)The entire political establishment is aligning to get this momentous change done at the moment of least accountability. And they will say anything to get it done, no matter how dishonest. This is not a choice between highways and clean energy and Social Security. The government can borrow at near zero interest rates to fund those kinds of investments. Social Security can pay out 100% of promised benefits for the next 20 years and if they want to extend that, they can raise the cap so that these millionaires who are so anxious for all of us to "sacrifice" can put some more money in that kitty.
Third Way is a terrible organization in so many ways. But this may be the most dishonest thing they've ever done. The idea of pitting future "investments" against future security for the American people is as low as it gets. I know the older folks won't fall for it because they know very well that social security is what makes the difference between some of them living like animals and living like human beings when they are unable to work anymore. I trust the kids aren't so dumb that they think cutting their own benefits will somehow help them. We need investment desperately. And there's no reason we shouldn't do what wealthy investors all over the world are dong right now: use cheap money to stimulate the economy and build for the future. This is a very, very big con. I wish I believed that re-electing Obama will insure that this would never be signed into law. Unfortunately, I think we have to depend on the Tea Party. I hate that. http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2012/07/lame-duck-terrorism.html
|
4 replies, 470 views
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
| Author | Time | Post | |
| phantom power | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| HiPointDem | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| phantom power | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| limpyhobbler | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| DCKit | Jul 2012 | #4 |
Response to phantom power (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:37 PM
HiPointDem (16,919 posts)
1. kr. though the tea party is no better, and no savior, just another front group.
Response to HiPointDem (Reply #1)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:43 PM
phantom power (22,530 posts)
2. a day you find yourself saying "have to depend on the tea party" - that's a lousy day
|
|
Response to phantom power (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 10:43 PM
limpyhobbler (6,643 posts)
3. I don't get what she means "we have to depend on the Tea Party". n/t
Response to limpyhobbler (Reply #3)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:00 AM
DCKit (18,288 posts)
4. If they continue to be the party of "NO", nothing can be done.
|
There will be no progress on any meaningful legislation. It'll either die in the Senate, or be vetoed by the President.
The only thing we can do is kick the bastards out of the House in November. |

