Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:00 PM
SoCalDem (99,744 posts)
Is NBC covering the next Olympics too?Last edited Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:06 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Here's hoping that someone tells them (or whoever is covering it) that people have access to the internet and don't need to watch all their schmaltzy commercials..or to wait to watch a re-run of events available online in real-time.
I'm old enough to remember the old-timey coverage where you would set your alarm clock to watch something that was on in the wee hours .(pre-vcr days), and how wonderful it was when the Olympics was on because then the stations actually had something on after the midnight sign offs. If they want us to know all the back-stories of the athletes, why not a 2 or 3 night multi-hour special where all of them are profiled. And then when the games begin, just set up cameras, and let us watch.. I don't need to know what Bob Costas had for lunch, or how much Dr Nancy liked the Shepherds' Pie.. A week before the events, just give us a leisurely tour of the events ahead, tell us about the athletes, and then just show the damned sports when they are happening.. And perhaps have someone film start-to finish footage of each event, and offer it as pay-per view later
|
26 replies, 1785 views
| Author | Time | Post | |
| SoCalDem | Jul 2012 | OP | |
| petronius | Jul 2012 | #1 | |
| RockaFowler | Jul 2012 | #2 | |
| Booster | Jul 2012 | #3 | |
| SoCalDem | Jul 2012 | #5 | |
| Gregorian | Jul 2012 | #4 | |
| SoCalDem | Jul 2012 | #8 | |
| Gregorian | Jul 2012 | #9 | |
| ProdigalJunkMail | Jul 2012 | #6 | |
| truebrit71 | Jul 2012 | #7 | |
| ProdigalJunkMail | Jul 2012 | #10 | |
| Ezlivin | Jul 2012 | #11 | |
| pinboy3niner | Jul 2012 | #12 | |
| nadinbrzezinski | Jul 2012 | #20 | |
| zappaman | Jul 2012 | #24 | |
| tridim | Jul 2012 | #13 | |
| ProdigalJunkMail | Jul 2012 | #15 | |
| tridim | Jul 2012 | #16 | |
| ProdigalJunkMail | Jul 2012 | #21 | |
| sharp_stick | Jul 2012 | #17 | |
| NNN0LHI | Jul 2012 | #14 | |
| fishwax | Jul 2012 | #19 | |
| fishwax | Jul 2012 | #18 | |
| NYC Liberal | Jul 2012 | #22 | |
| hifiguy | Jul 2012 | #23 | |
| zappaman | Jul 2012 | #25 | |
| Drunken Irishman | Jul 2012 | #26 |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:03 PM
petronius (19,657 posts)
1. Your question makes the unfounded assumption that they're "covering" these Olympics
|
But at least we have a real good awareness of what various athletes have tweeted and facebooked over the course of the games...
|
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:03 PM
RockaFowler (4,860 posts)
2. Yes they are
|
And they will continue to have the Games until 2020 (when the latest TV contract ends)
|
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:05 PM
Booster (9,874 posts)
3. I was reading the other day about things that will be obsolete in the near future and
|
TV was one of them. I don't know what's coming but I'm not going to go out and buy some super-duper tv antenna anytime soon. Apparently all computers will be hooked up to our monitors and we can watch what we want, when we want.
|
Response to Booster (Reply #3)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:07 PM
SoCalDem (99,744 posts)
5. Sounds like a wonderful plan to me
|
|
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:06 PM
Gregorian (19,613 posts)
4. Leisurely. That's the word you have to look up now.
|
Everything, and everyone is going 500 mph now. Everything is corporate at the speed of sound.
And where is this online Olympics you speak of? I'm dvr'ing the nbc stuff, and wouldn't mind turning them off. Too fast, too much, too many. That's what's wrong with everything. I'm sounding like someone my own age now. All old and angry. |
Response to Gregorian (Reply #4)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:10 PM
SoCalDem (99,744 posts)
8. At the link I posted... here ya go
|
http://tvpc.com/Channel.php?ChannelID=2620
click on "home" and then live" to see the complete menu of live streaming tv from around the world.. some offer full screen too BBC1 BBC2 BBC3 BBC24HD are the best ones.. I flip back & forth to watch many events..as they are happening |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:08 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,065 posts)
6. NBC's coverage has been totally and completely lacking
|
and I do recall with great fondness getting up early or staying up really late to see events.
i knew NBC didn't give a shit about covering the Olympics (it was validated) when they covered 3.5 hours of the women's road race to the detriment of ALL THE OTHER EVENTS HAPPENING AT THAT TIME. They picked the longest, most tedious event, that they could easily break into and follow their commercial schedule and allow for the insipid interviews. Shortly after about 8:30 AM I made the decision to watch the rest online... sP |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:09 PM
truebrit71 (16,912 posts)
7. Yes. Unfortunately. Although they will not be showing the opening ceremonies in Russia 2014...
|
...because none of it will be 'tailored to the US audience'....*
*this is the bullshit excuse given by NBC after they deliberately edited out a segment honouring the victims of the 7/7 bombings that happened the day after London found out it had won the 2012 host-city bid in 2005... **oh and that sniveling little turd Bob Costas got to lick Rmoney's balls about single-handedly saving the Utah games and chiding the IOC chair for not honouring the Munich massacre which had bugger all to do with the London games other than the last number in the year was a '2'. FUCK NBC. |
Response to truebrit71 (Reply #7)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:12 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,065 posts)
10. well said n/t
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:13 PM
Ezlivin (8,017 posts)
11. Yes, with more commentary and censorship
|
Last edited Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:14 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) They're considering only showing the U.S. in the parade of nations (who cares about the others) and replacing the rest of the opening ceremony with clips from their Fall line-up of shows.
During each event the 10 hosts/commentators/reality-show-people will have a running commentary that replaces the audio. The event will be shown almost to the end, then will cut to a series of commercials. When it returns the 10 hosts will have a round-table discussion of an unrelated event and family member reactions, then it will replay the event again, stopping once more before the conclusion for another commercial break. When they return they will play the event's conclusion, once, then immediately switch to another event without comment. Most events, however, will not be shown: Only commented upon. |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:17 PM
pinboy3niner (27,548 posts)
12. Yes. And the 2016 Summer Olympics will be tape-delayed...in 2017.
|
|
Response to pinboy3niner (Reply #12)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 04:07 PM
nadinbrzezinski (120,388 posts)
20. careful, somebody in management will take that seriously
|
Me, no longer watching any NBC station... lame ass coverage. And posting IN REAL TIME on Facebook... |
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #20)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:54 PM
zappaman (8,378 posts)
24. Awwww.....are you upset you can't post spoilers here for us?
|
What is it with people who have to post Olympic results as soon as they happen, even though they know it hasn't aired here yet?
Do they really think the rest of DU doesn't know how to use the internet? |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:17 PM
tridim (40,732 posts)
13. I'm more concerned with the fact that you can't see a spiked volleyball on HDTV.
|
Whenever there is a spike or a hard serve, the HD compression causes the ball the literally disappear until it reaches its target. I did some freeze frames and sure enough the ball isn't being rendered, other than at the start and end points.
This wasn't a problem on old analog TV's because the ball would blur and you could interpret the motion. When the ball disappears while in play, sports stop being fun to watch. |
Response to tridim (Reply #13)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:20 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,065 posts)
15. I have not run into that at all n/t
Response to ProdigalJunkMail (Reply #15)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:30 PM
tridim (40,732 posts)
16. I suppose it could just be AT&T's compression..
|
Watch closer and report back.
|
Response to tridim (Reply #16)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 04:44 PM
ProdigalJunkMail (10,065 posts)
21. I will watch a couple of ballgames tonight
|
but lately I have been watching via the 'Net due to my generalized anger toward NBC over their incredibly crappy coverage.
sP |
Response to tridim (Reply #13)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:32 PM
sharp_stick (9,165 posts)
17. It looks fine on my set
|
Last edited Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:32 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) not sure if it's a tv thing or a difference in cable companies.
On edit, I'll take another look when I get a chance. |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:19 PM
NNN0LHI (67,185 posts)
14. And I think it was on all three channels too
|
Bob Costas has always sucked.
Don |
Response to NNN0LHI (Reply #14)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:59 PM
fishwax (25,093 posts)
19. It was, just not in the same year :)
|
CBS had them in 1960 (the first time they were broadcast) and NBC had them in 1964. ABC took over from 1968 to 1984. NBC has had them since 1988, and have them locked up through 2020. (These are all for the summer games--the winter games bounced around a bit more, but NBC has had them since 2002.)
|
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 03:49 PM
fishwax (25,093 posts)
18. I'm not really a fan of the coverage, but their ratings have been high, so I doubt they'll change
|
The ratings for the opening ceremonies were higher than any opening ceremony not held in the US, and the ratings for Sunday night were higher than any opening Sunday other than LA in '84 or Atlanta in '96. So people are still interested in the coverage that NBC provides, even with the results being readily available in advance and the sometimes exasperating segments about back stories.
I think the reason they remain popular in spite of such things is that a lot of people take pleasure in watching them as a community event. Also, it seems many people actually like the human interest segments. I think they're hit and miss, personally--so my solution will be to use the DVR, give the broadcast a head start while I catch up on other things, and then fast forward through commercials and those non-competitive segments that don't interest me. |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 04:49 PM
NYC Liberal (15,600 posts)
22. I've been watching CTV in Canada. So glad I don't have to suffer through NBC this year.
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 04:58 PM
hifiguy (13,029 posts)
23. The producers and commentators should be forced to watch
|
every Olympics telecast ABC ever did over and over and over again. That is the way it's supposed to be done, dumbasses. Jim McKay must be spinning in his grave.
|
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:55 PM
zappaman (8,378 posts)
25. I hope they never cover another one after the horrific coverage of the opening ceremony.
|
"That's Captain Hook...he's a pirate!"
Really, Matt? |
Response to SoCalDem (Original post)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:58 PM
Drunken Irishman (24,587 posts)
26. Yes. NBC will be broadcasting the next four Olympics and potentially beyond.
|
Last edited Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:59 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1) |

