Cable News Clips

Jim_S

(63 posts)

24. The paper of 'record' :-/

Wed May 8, 2024, 02:24 PM

May 8

Did you watch the full video of Democracy Now? What is wrong with an independent investigation? Even within the ranks of their paper, there are questions about the substance of this article. One doesn’t have to look too far to see that the NYTimes is more than willing to obfuscate the truth. Remember the build-up to the Iraq invasion? How did all that work out?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

52 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

60+ Journalism Profs Demand Investigation into Controversial NYT Article Alleging Oct. 7 Mass Rape [View all] Uncle Joe May 8 OP

What dumbasses. nocoincidences May 8 #1

Calling the survivors and victims liars is a disgrace is despicable. It only highlights what an hamas JohnSJ May 8 #2

I call it "We Hate Democracy Now!" madaboutharry May 8 #7

+++ JohnSJ May 8 #8

What's wrong with an investigation? If you want the truth to come out, I see nothing wrong with it. TeamProg May 8 #12

Simple question. revmclaren May 8 #14

It's not the "women" who would be investigated, it's the facts behind the STORIES. See the difference? TeamProg May 8 #17

Rape is rape. revmclaren May 8 #20

#ME TOO UNLESS YOU'RE A JEW. madaboutharry May 8 #16

yup Behind the Aegis May 8 #29

It would be worthwhile to investigate and for the NYT to substantiate their sources... Chakaconcarne May 8 #22

+++ TeamProg May 8 #25

It is shameful to assert there are no sources for this, after a mountain of evidence has been compiled. SunSeeker May 8 #37

Here's an hour's worth of sources for you. SunSeeker May 8 #36

That publication is pro-third party spoiler and always has been. mzmolly May 8 #18

The paper of 'record' :-/ Jim_S May 8 #24

I've seen enough of their videos mzmolly May 8 #40

I call it "Democracy? NO!" Behind the Aegis May 8 #30

Theocracy Now! shilling for authoritarian, extreme right wing religious fanatics. lapucelle May 8 #31

Does this involve the question 'what were they wearing?' mzmolly May 8 #3

Oh, the irony. TwilightZone May 8 #4

Have they ever interviewed an opposing point of view? JohnSJ May 8 #6

Screams followed by silence JohnSJ May 8 #5

Thank you for the link. revmclaren May 8 #10

It is disgraceful. JohnSJ May 8 #11

Wow. Thanks for posting that link. Hamas must be removed from the planet. SunSeeker May 8 #33

So they want us to believe that HAMAS Progressive dog May 8 #9

This is foul mcar May 8 #13

Are you saying the article is "fact"? JohnSJ May 8 #19

No, Hamas' brutality is fact mcar May 8 #26

The NYT article documents facts mcar May 8 #27

Thanks mcar. That is what I thought. Appreciate the clarification. JohnSJ May 8 #28

Funny how they never mention the livestreams and videos Hamas made of their actions sarisataka May 8 #15

So, they don't deny Hamas raped civilians, they're quibbling over what "mass" means! SunSeeker May 8 #21

I used to like some of democracy now, those days are long gone. BoomaofBandM May 8 #23

DN is questioning the NYT reporting, which people here on DU do all the friggin' time Chakaconcarne May 8 #32

There is PLENTY of back up. SunSeeker May 8 #34

Except this seems to be a recurring theme, and it always is from the same groups. It doesn't matter what JohnSJ May 8 #35

As a side note, the rec list just keeps on growing revmclaren May 8 #38

I noticed, and that in itself speaks volumes JohnSJ May 8 #39

I asked a question on a new Democracy Now revmclaren May 10 #45

I posted an answer to you, didn't you read it? n/t Uncle Joe May 10 #46

And I responded. revmclaren May 10 #47

Post away. Uncle Joe May 10 #48

Someone stating they are independent, does not mean they are objective. The only thing "independent" JohnSJ May 10 #49

I haven't found an instance. And im surfing through various archives. revmclaren May 10 #50

Having an independent investigation should not be unthinkable ... cliffside May 8 #41

Why don't these 60 journalists investigate it themselves? SunSeeker May 9 #42

These "journalism professors" are disgusting. That's not journalism. betsuni May 9 #43

Suspicion of women reporting en masse about rape. But of course. Malmsy May 10 #44

Wow! Where did the find 60+ Anti-Semite journalism professors? Chainfire May 10 #51

Those 60 "journalism professors" did not review the evidence of Hamas systematic rape. SunSeeker May 20 #52