Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
If he wants to speak about Stormy, he'll need to do it under oath in the court room. emulatorloo May 9 #1
Exactly. If he takes on oath, he can have his say. Irish_Dem May 9 #3
Under cross-examination. emulatorloo May 9 #5
THIS. Needs to be Shouted from the higest mountain. bluestarone May 9 #8
My first thought, too. Grins May 9 #9
This right here. sheshe2 May 9 #11
He doesn't understand why that rule applies to him! BlueKota May 10 #24
Trump has a right to attack witnesses the minute they are done testifying? Irish_Dem May 9 #2
He THINKS he should have that right. ShazzieB May 9 #12
The judge may have to clarify that point to dimwit. Irish_Dem May 9 #13
Trump can respond by testifying C_U_L8R May 9 #4
Ha! the con is dying to vilify Stormy over her spilling the beans on him onetexan May 9 #6
He wants a chance to do what he does best....Lie. Chainfire May 9 #7
She's done testifying Demobrat May 9 #10
I see we all are of a like-mind here - take the stand and make your point. NBachers May 9 #14
If traitortrump is allowed to attack Daniels in public, it can have a chilling effect on other witnesses. Hermit-The-Prog May 9 #15
If he was allowed to attack her in public Demobrat May 9 #16
This must burn Trump dlk May 9 #17
TSF Fears Women That is where the hate comes from Traurigkeit May 9 #20
Yes, he fears women, wonder where that came from? Think. Again. May 10 #30
Wriggle, little man. byronius May 9 #18
He wants to exercise his First Amendment right to lie - preferably not under oath. Marcuse May 9 #19
Stormy has suffered enough at his hands and other body parts. catrose May 9 #21
If he wants to respond, testify in court. sinkingfeeling May 9 #22
There's no Constitutional right to try your case in public Jersey Devil May 10 #23
And the other point, which the judge also mentioned, is that there are other witnesses Ocelot II May 10 #26
The judge telling it as it is. republianmushroom May 10 #25
that's the purpose of the trial. WhiteTara May 10 #27
This shows that trump is well aware of what the gag order states. captain queeg May 10 #28
I was going to say: on the stand, under oath... Good to see I'm not alone in thinking that. keithbvadu2 May 10 #29
Write a book big shot. Think. Again. May 10 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge denies Trump reques...»Reply #3