Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zeitghost

(3,930 posts)
27. Not all States had binding public elections
Mon Mar 4, 2024, 02:35 PM
Mar 2024

To select their EC electors until I believe 1824.

The constitution does not require a public vote. Each state legislature has the power to decide how their electors will be selected. Have you read Article II?
https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/#:~:text=The%20Person%20having%20the%20greatest,Ballot%20one%20of%20them%20for

This is really why democracy dies, there has to be a majority of the people behind the President Walleye Mar 2024 #1
Wealthy, land owners with powdered wigs... Omnipresent Mar 2024 #37
Good point. I think it was Will Rogers who said something like Walleye Mar 2024 #52
and slaves. Voltaire2 Mar 5 #53
Well, it's a constitutional technicality...not just some legal hairsplitting. Nt Fiendish Thingy Mar 2024 #2
Still a technicality. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #3
Bill Clinton never had a majority win in a presedential election Zeitghost Mar 2024 #11
I'm not saying a president who loses the popular vote but wins the electoral vote is illegitimate. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #16
I guess it's an interesting political fact Zeitghost Mar 2024 #19
But even a wild card winning the Super Bowl... Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #23
It runs counter to your opinion Zeitghost Mar 2024 #25
Answer to your question: Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #26
Not all States had binding public elections Zeitghost Mar 2024 #27
1992 & 1996, Bill Clinton won popular and electoral college ffr Mar 2024 #31
Yes... Zeitghost Mar 2024 #33
You said: "Bill Clinton never had a majority win in a presedential election" ffr Mar 2024 #48
I think you need to look up what Majority means Zeitghost Mar 2024 #51
You cited Wikipedia. Dr. Strange Mar 5 #54
Clearly not a good comparison with popular vs electoral vote. triron Mar 2024 #49
Did Hillary get a majority if one counts non voters? Kaleva Mar 2024 #32
No doubt a majority of voters did not want Trump. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #47
In the end.... Turbineguy Mar 2024 #4
Had Hillary won, it likely would have been a technicality too. All Mixed Up Mar 2024 #5
She would have certainly still had a plurality at the very least. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #7
Let's hope he doesn't change that in November. All Mixed Up Mar 2024 #15
The horse race pie just came out of the oven. Hugin Mar 2024 #6
Hardly a technicality, it's been the mechanism we've elected Prez for a long time. It is frustrating at times, for sure. Silent Type Mar 2024 #8
When it's a mechanism that would otherwise be declared unconstitional... Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #28
What? MichMan Mar 2024 #30
Reynolds v. Sims, 373 U.S. 533 (1964) Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #34
What other Constutional requirements do you regard to be a technicality? NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #9
We purport ourselves to be a democracy (at least a representative democracy.) Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #17
So, the Senate goes too, right? NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #22
The Senate has always had problems. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #24
Isn't that how electors are chosen? * mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2024 #35
Not necessarily. Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #18
At the time of the founding, the office of president wasn't considered to be important. J_William_Ryan Mar 2024 #10
House gop at the time knew he had russian support. Karadeniz Mar 2024 #12
Every republican president after Ike "won" via malfeasance of one sort or another PSPS Mar 2024 #13
you've diluted the meaning of the phrase 'on a technicality' to basically Voltaire2 Mar 2024 #14
If our country wishes to consider itself a democracy... Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #21
He didn't "win" MorbidButterflyTat Mar 2024 #20
I still believe Russian hackers together with Cambridge analytica triron Mar 2024 #50
Trump won because he prevailed under the process TexasDem69 Mar 2024 #29
You're confusing "winning on a technicality" with "winning illegitimately." Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #39
But you are referring to the sole deciding factor as a "technicality" TexasDem69 Mar 2024 #42
Cambridge Dictionary's definition: Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #45
See this story that just coincidentally popped up on my news feed: Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #46
The Electoral College is not a technicality DavidDvorkin Mar 2024 #36
That "technicality" is the election sarisataka Mar 2024 #38
See Post 39. nt Tommy Carcetti Mar 2024 #41
I agree with post 38 and believe it is 100% correct nt sarisataka Mar 2024 #43
The electoral college needs to go LetMyPeopleVote Mar 2024 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump won the 2016 electi...»Reply #27