General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmagicarpet
(14,520 posts)honest.abe
(8,707 posts)If it was much bigger you wouldn't see the corona or solar flares. If it was much smaller you wouldn't get totality.
littlemissmartypants
(23,092 posts)the sun and the moon itself that create the conditions that are just right for the eclipse to appear. When taking all of that into consideration it's truly remarkable.
❤️
honest.abe
(8,707 posts)highplainsdem
(49,274 posts)For this
honest.abe
(8,707 posts)Thanks for posting!
Warpy
(111,652 posts)It's just as well, the sky is overcast, hazy. It's already getting a bit gloomy, got an hour to go to peak gloominess.
Elessar Zappa
(14,224 posts)But I was surprised because it definitely made things less bright and a bit dim but I thought that, given it was 75% coverage, it would be a lot darker.
Warpy
(111,652 posts)There was one in the 70s that was about 95% in Boston. I popped across the river into Cambridge and ran into a real zoo, morons dressed in fringe, feathers and face paint banging drums to make the evil spirit disgorge the sun.
It's already nearly back to normal here, a whole lotta nothin.
Well, at least the crooked preachers in Tejas got another reason to suck money out of the faithful.
Ocelot II
(116,412 posts)Maybe it will get a little darker than it already is...
calimary
(81,807 posts)But we were watching the coverage every moment.
Beaverhausen
(24,480 posts)slightlv
(3,011 posts)So of course we're not in the path of totality. If we were I can guarantee it'd be overcast!
et tu
(1,082 posts)And Rec
Hugin
(33,353 posts)It is moving quickly. Theres not going to be any cool light tricks because of the diffusion of the clouds, but I can comfortably see the eclipse.
CANADIANBEAVER69
(385 posts)If so, that's pretty cool
elleng
(131,840 posts)usonian
(10,205 posts)IcyPeas
(22,015 posts)The news channels are obnoxious
catbyte
(34,645 posts)All that blah blah blah gets on my nerves, too.
IcyPeas
(22,015 posts)I thought their coverage might be good.... but too much blah blah blah
I mean they just keep talking and talking and repeating over and over.... there's nothing else to say
I feel sorry for these reporters because obviously they are expected to do this... it's exhausting.
🌘🌗🌖🌕🌔🌓🌒
calimary
(81,807 posts)Portland OR wouldnt have been a decent viewing spot anyway, being so far to the west of the path. But the coverage was interesting and over all, I thought, well done. Combination of scientific experts and happy enthusiastic amateurs.
llmart
(15,612 posts)I'm digging NASA's music! I'm in northern Macomb and it was spectacular! A bit eerie too.
catbyte
(34,645 posts)was so dim at the peak that it felt like I was wearing sunglasses inside even though the sun was shining. I noticed a lot of my neighbors were out watching it which was cool. No wonder ancient people got spooked and thought the world was ending. These days, there's no excuse for it. Steve Bannon and his bogus prayer BS.
AnotherMother4Peace
(4,275 posts)catbyte
(34,645 posts)We're only getting 96% totality here.
malaise
(269,979 posts)Ah well
dweller
(23,814 posts)😎
honest.abe
(8,707 posts)The street lights kicked on and got cooler.
Amazing but now he has to deal with traffic getting home!
usonian
(10,205 posts)Think. Again.
(9,577 posts)honest.abe
(8,707 posts)Amazing!
Think. Again.
(9,577 posts)stage left
(2,973 posts)3:15. It's a gold crescent. I think we're getting about 78 or 80% totality. Scattered clouds. Still have a good bit of light.
Charlie Chapulin
(180 posts)markodochartaigh
(1,244 posts)that I traveled back to Texas to see totality. There is really nothing like it.
usonian
(10,205 posts)Stardust Mirror
(394 posts)except it's from NASA, part of some evil scheme dontcha know
/jk jeez